I just read a fascinating article* by a young teacher about the interview process she endured in finding a job. Though Alison Stachniak had always worked in mainstream public schools, she'd also thought school choice sounded like a good idea. Now, because public schools are cutting back on hiring, she started looking at charter schools for employment. (Remember: Charter schools ARE public schools, but can receive funding even when public schools don't.)
What she found opened her eyes about the complexity of such options.
First of all, when you read the article, you will notice as I did that this is no ordinary teacher. Judging by the harrowing process she underwent to find a job, and her thoughtful decision-making process, you'll wish this woman taught YOUR kids. (And she happens to share my own belief that kids should feel valued and understand why rules are necessary, not just follow them blindly so the school can look good.)
But her experience was sobering. Why? Mostly because these charter schools (which, remember, receive PUBLIC funding), didn't always equal better education.
For instance, at one school she initially thought promising, student test scores--not their projects or papers or photos of kids learning--were prominently displayed at the front entrance. That school served Latino families from rich cultural backgrounds, but it discouraged children from speaking Spanish and did not build on those cultural connections to engage students. On paper, especially given the emphasis on test scores everywhere right now, this school would seem like a fine place to learn AND teach. In the end, though, it would not be a happy position for a teacher like Ms. Stachniak, who wanted to serve a school that was "good for children."
Here's a quote I like:
My purpose in writing is not to imply that these other charter schools are not successful. I am certain that they provide many students with an outstanding education. I do, however, encourage educators and parents to look closely before making a choice about a school. I also encourage educators and policymakers to question the charter school movement as a panacea for public school problems. How successful are charter schools on a large scale in improving the quality of public education? Are we really providing equal opportunities in educational choice when some parents simply do not have the educational, socioeconomic, or linguistic means of choosing the best school for their child?
I see this personally as I watch my son adjust to private school. Is he being valued as a person? Is memorization being emphasized over creativity and critical thinking? Does the school foster personal growth over quantitative achievement? I cannot yet answer these questions, but I will need to eventually. At any rate, just because it's a well-regarded private school doesn't mean it's better. And this is true of any educational setting.
By the way, if you don't read the article (and I hope you do), after completing her grueling interview process, Ms. Stachniak was offered a job at the charter school where she really wanted to work, a place where every student spends five hours/week working in the school garden, and are given an authentic voice in their education. Congrats to her AND to the school that hired her.
*NOTE: The article cited here is only available to Ed Week subscribers. Please email me for a copy.